Thanks for the comment. I generally agree. However, I do acknowledge that some people have an interest in understanding the creative workflow. I think that is a reasonable request. And there really isn’t any reason to not disclose it.
Very easy to achieve, especially for shorter articles. I would not recommend it though. Humanizers do mess up the meaning your text sometimes. I’d rather have good, coherent AI assisted writing tbh.
I just used it. One observation that concerns me: after I inserted photographs into my article, Pangram's score dropped from 95% human to 77% human. The article itself did not change. I wrote every word myself, and the photographs were my own original images taken with my personal Iphone camera. They were not AI-generated, edited, or enhanced in any way.
If adding my own unedited photographs can lower the reported "human" score, it raises questions about what Pangram is actually evaluating and how reliable these percentages are as an indicator of human authorship.
I was floored. That was the only change I made. I added 2 photographs. One at the beginning of the article and one at the end. Not altered, not ai, my own photographs. I compel people to try it.
Disclose it or not.
I don't care much if it is written with help of AI, completely by AI or by a person.
What interests me is simple: Is it good? Researched?
I take everytime good AI writing over bad human writing.
I am not talking about that: One prompt, one novel AI writing.
I am talking about AI writing where the human is always at the wheel, rejects, refines.
Thanks for the comment. I generally agree. However, I do acknowledge that some people have an interest in understanding the creative workflow. I think that is a reasonable request. And there really isn’t any reason to not disclose it.
Maybe.
But do I have to know if Bukowski was drunk when he wrote this or that chapter?
Or Hemingway? Though his work was forged as much by himself as by his editor.
Does anybody disclose how much of “The old man and the sea” was his work or Perkin’s?
Another example: Alexandre Dumas and his writing manufacture. How much of “The three musketeers” was written by him?
Basically, you are right about the disclosure, but it is also a triage.
You might miss out something good just based on your believes or something you really have no clear opinion about.
“This article was written under the influence” - wouldn’t that be something? 😂
I’d love that.
Coffee would be on top of the list.
Followed by rosé and red wine.
With moderation of course.
Grass is green,
sky is blue.
Clouds are white,
what else is new?
Best part about this post, is if you use the AI checker, it says it is 100% written by a human. Wild.
Very easy to achieve, especially for shorter articles. I would not recommend it though. Humanizers do mess up the meaning your text sometimes. I’d rather have good, coherent AI assisted writing tbh.
I just used it. One observation that concerns me: after I inserted photographs into my article, Pangram's score dropped from 95% human to 77% human. The article itself did not change. I wrote every word myself, and the photographs were my own original images taken with my personal Iphone camera. They were not AI-generated, edited, or enhanced in any way.
If adding my own unedited photographs can lower the reported "human" score, it raises questions about what Pangram is actually evaluating and how reliable these percentages are as an indicator of human authorship.
That’s an interesting observation. I’m not sure why adding a photograph should alter the score. AFAIK it only evaluates text.
I just read that cropping a photo does give a false positive on AI. I did crop one of my photos using substack's tools.
I was floored. That was the only change I made. I added 2 photographs. One at the beginning of the article and one at the end. Not altered, not ai, my own photographs. I compel people to try it.
It’s honestly fascinating. It shouldn’t do that.
Where is this “Pangram button located?
Three dots → Scan for AI text
https://mclovin03.substack.com/p/substacks-new-ai-detector-just-changed?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=8nzsss